Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework

5Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The attributable fraction (population) has attracted much attention from a theoretical perspective and has been used extensively to assess the impact of potential health interventions. However, despite its extensive use, there is much confusion about its concept and calculation methods. In this article, we discuss the concepts of and calculation methods for the attributable fraction and related measures in the counterfactual framework, both with and without stratification by covariates. Generally, the attributable fraction is useful when the exposure of interest has a causal effect on the outcome. However, it is important to understand that this statement applies to the exposed group. Although the target population of the attributable fraction (population) is the total population, the causal effect should be present not in the total population but in the exposed group. As related measures, we discuss the preventable fraction and prevented fraction, which are generally useful when the exposure of interest has a preventive effect on the outcome, and we further propose a new measure called the attributed fraction. We also discuss the causal and preventive excess fractions, and provide notes on vaccine efficacy. Finally, we discuss the relations between the aforementioned six measures and six possible patterns using a conceptual schema.

References Powered by Scopus

Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.

1386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proportion of disease caused or prevented by a given exposure, trait or intervention

894Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The estimation and interpretation of attributable risk in health research

395Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Bias assessment and correction for Levin’s population attributable fraction in the presence of confounding

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Errors in the Calculation of the Population Attributable Fraction

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Re: Bias in Calculation of Attributable Fractions Using Relative Risks from Nonsmokers Only

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suzuki, E., & Yamamoto, E. (2023). Attributable fraction and related measures: Conceptual relations in the counterfactual framework. Journal of Causal Inference, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2021-0068

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

33%

Environmental Science 1

33%

Mathematics 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free