Family Policies and Women’s Employment: A Regression Analysis

  • Hicks A
  • Kenworthy L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is good reason to suspect that “family-friendly” or “women-friendly” policies such the government provision or subsidization of child care, paid maternity leave, and extensive public employment will increase levels of female employment. There is supportive evidence from studies of individual behavior (Gustafsson and Stafford, 1992; Leibowitz, Klerman, and Waite, 1992; Barrow, 1996; Ondrich, Spiess, and Yang, 1996; Ilmakunnas, 1997; Joesch, 1997; Fagnani, 1998; Kimmel, 1998; Powell, 1998; Anderson and Levine, 1999; Ondrich et al., 1999; Michalopoulos and Robins, 2000; Smith, Downs, and O’Connell, 2001; Chevalier and Viitanen, 2002; Del Boca, 2002; Pylkkänen and Smith, 2003; Rønsen and Sundstrom, 2002; Gottschall and Bird, 2003; Hofferth and Curtin, 2003). But at the macro (country) level, the association has been largely assumed rather than demonstrated

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hicks, A., & Kenworthy, L. (2008). Family Policies and Women’s Employment: A Regression Analysis. In Method and Substance in Macrocomparative Analysis (pp. 196–220). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594081_6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free