Association between self-reported METs and other perioperative cardiorespiratory fitness assessment tools in abdominal surgery—a prospective cross-sectional correlation study

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Cardiovascular complications represent a significant proportion of adverse events during the perioperative period, necessitating accurate preoperative risk assessment. This study aimed to investigate the association between well-established risk assessment tools and self-reported preoperative physical performance, quantified by metabolic equivalent (MET) equivalents, in high-risk patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery. A prospective cross-sectional correlation study was conducted, involving 184 patients admitted to a Gastrointestinal Surgery Department. Various risk assessment tools, including the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), Surgical Mortality Probability Model (S-MPM), American University of Beirut (AUB)-HAS2 Cardiovascular Risk Index, and Surgical Risk Calculator (NSQIP-MICA), were utilized to evaluate perioperative risk. Patients self-reported their physical performance using the MET-REPAIR questionnaire. The findings demonstrated weak or negligible correlations between the risk assessment tools and self-reported MET equivalents (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.1 to − 0.3). However, a statistically significant relationship was observed between the ability to ascend two flights of stairs and the risk assessment scores. Good correlations were identified among ASA-PS, S-MPM, NSQIP-MICA, and AUB-HAS2 scores (Spearman’s ρ = 0.3–0.8). Although risk assessment tools exhibited limited correlation with self-reported MET equivalents, simple questions regarding physical fitness, such as the ability to climb stairs, showed better associations. A comprehensive preoperative risk assessment should incorporate both objective and subjective measures to enhance accuracy. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these findings and develop a comprehensive screening tool for high-risk patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.

References Powered by Scopus

Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: A meta-analysis

2405Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (The Duke Activity Status Index)

1333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery

596Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Czajka, S., & Krzych, Ł. J. (2024). Association between self-reported METs and other perioperative cardiorespiratory fitness assessment tools in abdominal surgery—a prospective cross-sectional correlation study. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56887-5

Readers over time

‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

75%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0