Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness: The case of direct computer-patient interfaces

12Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the ethics of e-trust and e-trustworthiness in the context of health care, looking at direct computer-patient interfaces (DCPIs), information systems that provide medical information, diagnosis, advice, consenting and/or treatment directly to patients without clinicians as intermediaries. Designers, manufacturers and deployers of such systems have an ethical obligation to provide evidence of their trustworthiness to users. My argument for this claim is based on evidentialism about trust and trustworthiness: the idea that trust should be based on sound evidence of trustworthiness. Evidence of trustworthiness is a broader notion than one might suppose, including not just information about the risks and performance of the system, but also interactional and context-based information. I suggest some sources of evidence in this broader sense that make it plausible that designers, manufacturers and deployers of DCPIs can provide evidence to users that is cognitively simple, easy to communicate, yet rationally connected with actual trustworthiness. © 2011 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nickel, P. J. (2011). Ethics in e-trust and e-trustworthiness: The case of direct computer-patient interfaces. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(4), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-011-9271-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free