Classifying the reported ability in clinical mobility descriptions

5Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Assessing how individuals perform different activities is key information for modeling health states of individuals and populations. Descriptions of activity performance in clinical free text are complex, including syntactic negation and similarities to textual entailment tasks. We explore a variety of methods for the novel task of classifying four types of assertions about activity performance: Able, Unable, Unclear, and None (no information). We find that ensembling an SVM trained with lexical features and a CNN achieves 77.9% macro F1 score on our task, and yields nearly 80% recall on the rare Unclear and Unable samples. Finally, we highlight several challenges in classifying performance assertions, including capturing information about sources of assistance, incorporating syntactic structure and negation scope, and handling new modalities at test time. Our findings establish a strong baseline for this novel task, and identify intriguing areas for further research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newman-Griffis, D., Zirikly, A., Divita, G., & Desmet, B. (2019). Classifying the reported ability in clinical mobility descriptions. In BioNLP 2019 - SIGBioMed Workshop on Biomedical Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the 18th BioNLP Workshop and Shared Task (pp. 1–10). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-5001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free