Virtual limitations of the flesh: Merleau-ponty and the phenomenology of technological determinism

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The debate between instrumentalist and technological determinist positions on the nature of technology characterised the early history of the philosophy of technology. In recent years however technological determinism has ceased to be viewed as a credible philosophical position within the field. This paper uses Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology to reconsider the technological determinist outlook in phenomenological terms as an experiential response to the encounter with the phenomenon of modern technology. Recasting the instrumentalist-determinist debate in a phenomenological manner enables one to reconcile the apparent dualism of the instrumentalist and determinist positions through Merleau-Ponty's ontology of the flesh. This ontology has recently been used to ground accounts of virtual embodiment. We argue that in addition to explaining away the classical form of technological determinism, it can also phenomenologically ground a novel understanding of technological determinism. Namely, a technological determinism of virtual embodiment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

du Toit, J., & Swer, G. M. (2021). Virtual limitations of the flesh: Merleau-ponty and the phenomenology of technological determinism. Phenomenology and Mind. Rosenberg and Sellier. https://doi.org/10.17454/PAM-2002

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free