Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: How to open a Pandora's box

39Citations
Citations of this article
72Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A tumour biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated in tumour samples as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. The development of a biomarker contemplates distinct phases, including discovery by hypothesis-generating preclinical or exploratory studies, development and qualification of the assay for the identification of the biomarker in clinical samples, and validation of its clinical significance. Although guidelines for the development and validation of biomarkers are available, their implementation is challenging, owing to the diversity of biomarkers being developed. The term 'validation' undoubtedly has several meanings; however, in the context of biomarker research, a test may be considered valid if it is 'fit for purpose'. In the process of validation of a biomarker assay, a key point is the validation of the methodology. Here we discuss the challenges for the technical validation of immunohistochemical and gene expression assays to detect tumour biomarkers and provide suggestions of pragmatic solutions to address these challenges. © 2011 Marchiò et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchiò, C., Dowsett, M., & Reis-Filho, J. S. (2011, April 19). Revisiting the technical validation of tumour biomarker assays: How to open a Pandora’s box. BMC Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-41

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free