Post-Modernism, Social Constructionism, and the Science Wars

  • O’Donohue W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Any overview of the philosophy of science would not be complete without covering these recent views as they have received a lot of attention in the past few decades. Many of these views are quite controversial on a number of dimensions—sometimes the criticism is that these views are meaningless or at a minimum obscurantist (see the so-called Sokal affair that will be discussed below); sometimes the claim is that they are unfairly and unduly incendiary—for example, a prominent feminist critic of science Harding (1986) has called Newton’s classic Principia “a rape manual” because “science is the male rape of female nature”; and of course sometimes the criticism is simply that they are wrong.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Donohue, W. (2013). Post-Modernism, Social Constructionism, and the Science Wars. In Clinical Psychology and the Philosophy of Science (pp. 119–134). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00185-2_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free