The tangible common denominator of substance use disorders: A reply to commentaries to Rehm et al. (2013a)

45Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In response to our suggestion to define substance use disorders via 'heavy use over time', theoretical and conceptual issues, measurement problems and implications for stigma and clinical practice were raised. With respect to theoretical and conceptual issues, no other criterion has been shown, which would improve the definition. Moreover, heavy use over time is shown to be highly correlated with number of criteria in current DSM-5. Measurement of heavy use over time is simple and while there will be some underestimation or misrepresentation of actual levels in clinical practice, this is not different from the status quo and measurement of current criteria. As regards to stigma, research has shown that a truly dimensional concept can help reduce stigma. In conclusion, 'heavy use over time' as a tangible common denominator should be seriously considered as definition for substance use disorder. © The Author 2013. Medical Council on Alcohol and Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rehm, J., Anderson, P., Gual, A., Kraus, L., Marmet, S., Nutt, D. J., … Gmel, G. (2014, January). The tangible common denominator of substance use disorders: A reply to commentaries to Rehm et al. (2013a). Alcohol and Alcoholism. https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agt171

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free