Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Initial experience on 27 consecutive patients

12Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent reports have demonstrated that robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy is technically feasible. We report technical and functional results of a large series of patients undergoing laparoscopic cystectomy with the da Vinci surgical system (DVSS). A total of 27 patients (24 males) underwent laparoscopic radical cystectomy with the DVSS (intuitive surgical) between January 2004 and December 2005. Indications for cystectomy were muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) or leiomyosarcoma of the urinary bladder (n = 24) and bladder shrinking following prior radiotherapy for TCC. A pelvic lymphadenectomy was a routine part of the procedure. Urinary diversions were ilieal conduits (n = 19) and ileal neobladders (n = 8). Mean operating time was 340 min (range 150-450) with a mean blood loss of 301 ml (range 50-550). The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved during lymphadenectomy was 23. Surgical margins were negative except in one case. After a mean follow-up of 10.2 months, two perioperative (anastomotic leakage, adhesions) and three postoperative complications (ileus, intestinal fistula, urinary tract obstruction) occurred. Six out of seven patients reported satisfying erectile function following nerve-sparing surgery. Day-time continence was completely restored after a mean 3.5 months in seven of eight patients. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cystectomy is a safe procedure. Satisfying functional and oncological short-term results can be achieved within acceptable operating time limits. © 2007 Springer London.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mottrie, A., Carpentier, P., Schatteman, P., Fonteyne, E., Suttmann, H., Stöckle, M., & Siemer, S. (2007). Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: Initial experience on 27 consecutive patients. Journal of Robotic Surgery, 1(3), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-007-0035-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free