Human Dignity in Legal Argumentation: A Functional Perspective

3Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A functional universalistic approach to human dignity in legal argumentation - a theory which applies three variables to define the functions of dignity: content width, argumentative power, and applicability before courts - relative individual right, objective value and source of human rights as legitimate basic functions - the problematic nature of hybrid functions created by blending the basic functions - a set of principles to avoid hybrid functions and minimise the problems caused by them - qualitative analysis of several examples of judgments by supreme, constitutional and international courts to support the theory

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Horák, F. (2022). Human Dignity in Legal Argumentation: A Functional Perspective. European Constitutional Law Review, 18(2), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019622000141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free