The responses of visual neurons in the frontal eye field are biased for saccades

12Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous research suggests that visually responsive neurons in the frontal eye field (FEF) respond to visual targets even when they are not the goal of a saccadic eye movement. These results raise the possibility that these neurons respond to visual targets independent of the effector that is to be used to acquire the target locations. In the present study, we examined whether a plan to execute a saccade or a reach to a visual target influenced the response to and the representation of targets in the FEF. We recorded single unit responses to the onset of the target, during the delay period, and around the time of the movement, on interleaved saccade and reach trials of a delayed-response task.Wefound that the responses of approximately equal percentages of visual, visuomovement, and movement neurons (50%, 58%, and 58%, respectively) were greater on saccade trials than on reach trials in at least one interval of the delayed-response task. Converse biases, in favor of reaches, were much less frequent (13%, 10%, and 19%, in visual, visuomovement, and movement neurons respectively). Thus, although visual neurons may not be directly involved in triggering saccadic eye movements, they are nonetheless highly saccade-biased, with percentages comparable to neurons that are directly involved in triggering saccadic eye movements. Copyright © 2009 Society for Neuroscience.

References Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawrence, B. M., & Snyder, L. H. (2009). The responses of visual neurons in the frontal eye field are biased for saccades. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(44), 13815–13822. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2352-09.2009

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘240481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

50%

Researcher 21

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26

43%

Neuroscience 19

32%

Psychology 11

18%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0