Psychological contract research: Older, but is it wiser?

11Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The authors provide a critical introduction to the psychological contract by reviewing important challenges researchers have raised previously against the psychological contract, and outline gaps in understanding that can guide future research. They focus on nine key challenges and for each consider why the challenge is important and the extent to which it has been addressed. What emerges from their review is that, while there have been several major critiques of the psychological contract, the challenges raised by these critiques in terms of addressing fundamental aspects of the psychological contract—such as its implicitness, the nature of the exchange, the interaction of the two parties, and how it should be managed—have been largely unaddressed. The authors believe that the best way to advance understanding of psychological contracts is to revisit the challenges, along with the associated issues of designing empirical research to investigate complex implicit, multiparty, intersubjective phenomena.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Conway, N., & Pekcan, C. (2019). Psychological contract research: Older, but is it wiser? In Handbook of Research on the Psychological Contract at Work (pp. 10–34). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788115681.00009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free