Dynamic modal correlation of an automotive rear subframe, with particular reference to the modelling of welded joints

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper presents a comparison between the experimental investigation and the Finite Element (FE) modal analysis of an automotive rear subframe. A modal correlation between the experimental data and the forecasts is performed. The present numerical model constitutes a predictive methodology able to forecast the experimental dynamic behaviour of the structure. The actual structure is excited with impact hammers and the modal response of the subframe is collected and evaluated by the PolyMAX algorithm. Both the FE model and the structural performance of the subframe are defined according to the Ferrari S.p.A. internal regulations. In addition, a novel modelling technique for welded joints is proposed that represents an extension of ACM2 approach, formulated for spot weld joints in dynamic analysis. Therefore, the Modal Assurance Criterion (MAC) is considered the optimal comparison index for the numerical-experimental correlation. In conclusion, a good numerical-experimental agreement from 50 Hz up to 500 Hz has been achieved by monitoring various dynamic parameters such as the natural frequencies, the mode shapes, and frequency response functions (FRFs) of the structure that represent a validation of this FE model for structural dynamic applications.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rotondella, V., Merulla, A., Baldini, A., & Mantovani, S. (2017). Dynamic modal correlation of an automotive rear subframe, with particular reference to the modelling of welded joints. Advances in Acoustics and Vibration, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8572674

Readers over time

‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

55%

Researcher 4

36%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 6

46%

Social Sciences 3

23%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

23%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0