Cost-effectiveness of a decentralized care model for managing multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review protocol

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the available economic evidence of a decentralized care model compared to a centralized model for treating multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Introduction: Diseases that affect physiological health create a burden on human livelihoods and the economy. There is a lack of studies examining the economic evaluation of MDR-TB across different countries. A preliminary search identified no published or ongoing reviews on MDR-TB in LMICs. Inclusion criteria: Studies will be eligible if they include both patients receiving centralized care (ie, care provided by specialist centers through inpatient or outpatient services) and patients receiving decentralized care (ie, care provided by grassroots community workers in peripheral facilities or in the patients' residence) for MDR-TB in LMICs. Eligible studies will report economic evaluations of treatment for MDR-TB. Methods: A preliminary search of MEDLINE (PubMed) was undertaken using MeSH terms, such as MDR-TB, economic evaluation, therapeutics, LMICs. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles, abstracts, and full text against the inclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion or with a third reviewer. The JBI checklist for economic evaluations will be utilized to evaluate the methodological quality. Data will be extracted using a modified JBI data extraction form for economic evaluations. The Dominance Ranking Matrix, developed by JBI for economic evaluations, will be used to summarize and compare the results of different types of economic evaluations (cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit analysis, cost-utility analysis, or cost-minimization analysis). Cost per quality-adjusted life year gained and cost per disability-adjusted life year averted will be measures for economic evaluation. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to assess the certainty of economic evidence. Review registration: PROSPERO CRD42022368696.