Literature reviews and inaccurate referencing: An exploratory study of academic librarians

17Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using focus group interviewing, this article explores the views of the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) librarians about the literature of library and information science. The article touches on how these librarians do their literature searches and conveys their opinions about the professional literature. In conducting literature searches for work-related activities and the preparation of conference papers and manuscripts for journal submission, they tend to search the literature selectively for timely articles. They have observed instances of inaccurate referencing in the published literature, even in works of noted authors. A number of the librarians value the literature of subject disciplines more than they do that of library and information science. The article concludes with observations from selected former journal editors and current editorial board members, and identifies topics meriting further study.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hernon, P., & Metoyer-Duran, C. (1992). Literature reviews and inaccurate referencing: An exploratory study of academic librarians. College and Research Libraries, 53(6), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_53_06_499

Readers over time

‘13‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

50%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Researcher 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 3

43%

Sports and Recreations 2

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

14%

Arts and Humanities 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0