Socratic Dialogue and Guided Discovery in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Modified Delphi Panel

15Citations
Citations of this article
83Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Published guides for the practice of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) include a range of recommendations for the use of Socratic dialogue (or Socratic questioning) and guided discovery. While it is accepted that a specific dialogue process can be useful to support the way a therapist develops a cognitive case conceptualization (or case formulation), structures a session, or uses techniques, the stylistic aspects of Socratic dialogue remain unclear. In particular, the role of collaboration in the dialogue process has not been clearly articulated in the literature to date. Reaching expert consensus on the ideal conditions for the use of Socratic dialogue can guide further empirical study, including the design of a much needed complete and accurate assessment of therapist skill in its use. This article summarizes the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of a second expert panel on these specific features of Socratic dialogue in order to guide further empirical study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kazantzis, N., Beck, J. S., Clark, D. A., Dobson, K. S., Hofmann, S. G., Leahy, R. L., & Wing Wong, C. (2018). Socratic Dialogue and Guided Discovery in Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Modified Delphi Panel. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy, 11(2), 140–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41811-018-0012-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free