Evaluation of quantitative liver function tests in HIV-positive patients under anti-retroviral therapy

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aims: Quantitative tests of liver function (QTLF) which are based on the hepatic metabolism or clearance of test substances have been successfully used to predict prognosis of a variety of different liver diseases. Still sufficient data in HIV-patients under anti-retroviral therapy (ART) are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this prospective study was to investigate if and to what extent ART influences a broad panel of quantitative tests of liver function in patients with HIV-infection. Patients and Methods: Nineteen patients (14 males, 5 females, mean age 40 years) with HIV-infection underwent QTLF including lidocaine half-life test (LHT), galactose elimination capacity (GEC), and indocyanine green clearance (IGC). These tests were performed before and 3 to 6 months after initiation of anti-retroviral therapy. Twenty age-matched healthy, medication-and virus-free adults served as controls. Results: Lidocaine half-life was significantly lower in HIV-patients without ART. Combining anti-retroviral therapies shifted cytochrome p450 activity back into standard ranges. Galactose elimination capacity as a parameter of cytosolic liver function and indocyanine green clearance as a parameter of liver perfusion were not affected by ART. Conclusions: QTLF may be a tool to predict prognosis or hepatic complications in HIV-infected patients with liver disease. Early determination of lidocaine half-life seems to be useful - this should be considered during the treatment of HIV-positive individuals. © I. Holzapfel Publishers 2009.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Miller, M., Kahraman, A., Ross, B., Beste, M., & Gerken, G. (2009). Evaluation of quantitative liver function tests in HIV-positive patients under anti-retroviral therapy. European Journal of Medical Research, 14(9), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-783x-14-9-369

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free