Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection

13Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How may clinical ethics committees (CECs) inspire ethical reflection among healthcare professionals? How may they deal with organizational ethics issues? In recent years, Norwegian CECs have attempted different activites that stretch or go beyond the standard trio of education, consultation, and policy work. We studied the novel activities of Norwegian CECs by examining annual reports and interviewing CEC members. Through qualitative analysis we identified nine categories of novel CEC activities, which we describe by way of examples. In light of the findings, we argue that some novel working methods may be well suited to promote ethical reflection among clinicians, and that the CEC may be a suitable venue for discussing issues of organizational ethics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Magelssen, M., Pedersen, R., & Førde, R. (2016). Novel Paths to Relevance: How Clinical Ethics Committees Promote Ethical Reflection. HEC Forum, 28(3), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-015-9291-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free