The application of suction and blowing in performance improvement of transonic airfoils with shock control bump

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Shock Control Bump (SCB) reduces the wave drag in transonic ight. To control the boundary layer separation and to reduce the wave drag for two transonic airfoils, RAE-2822 and NACA-64A010, we investigate the application of two flow control methods, i.e. suction and blowing, to add them to the SCB. An adjoint gradient-based optimization algorithm is used to find the optimum shape and location of SCB. The performance of both Hybrid Suction/SCB (HSS) and Hybrid Blowing/SCB (HBS) is a function of the sucked or injected mass flow rate and their position. A parametric study is performed to find the near optimum values of the aerodynamic coefficients and efficiency. A RANS solver is validated and used for this flow analysis. Using HSS method, the aerodynamic efficiencies of these two airfoils are increased by, respectively, 8.6% and 3.9%, in comparison to the airfoils with optimized bumps. For HBS configuration, improvements are respectively 13.5% and 9.0%. The best non-dimensional mass flow rate for suction is found to be around 0.003 for both airfoils, and for blowing this is about 0.0025 for RAE-2822 airfoil and about 0.002 for NACA-64A010. The best locations for suction and blowing are found to be, respectively, right before and after the SCB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mazaheri, K., Nejati, A., & Kiani, K. C. (2017). The application of suction and blowing in performance improvement of transonic airfoils with shock control bump. Scientia Iranica, 24(1), 274–292. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free