Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia

47Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique with the epidural technique with regard to time to initiate and manage, motor block, onset of analgesia and satisfaction during labour. Methods: Upon requesting analgesia, 50 healthy term parturients were randomized in a prospective, double-blind fashion to receive either CSE analgesia or lumbar epidural analgesia in the labour floor of a university hospital at an academic medical centre. The epidural group (n = 24) received bupivacaine 0.0625%-fentanyl 0.0002% with 0.05 ml in 10 ml local anesthetic sodium bicarbonate 8.4% and epinephrine 1:200, 000. The CSE group (n = 26) received intrathecal 25 μg fentanyl and 2.5 mg bupivacaine. Additional analgesia was provided upon maternal request. Results: There were no differences (P > 0.05) in time to perform either technique, motor blockade, or parturient satisfaction or in the number of times that the anesthesiologist was called to perform any intervention. Although the first sign of analgesia was not different between the two groups, the onset of complete analgesia was more rapid with the CSE technique (Visual Analogue Pain Score (VAPS) at five minutes

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hepner, D. L., Gaiser, R. R., Cheek, T. G., & Gutsche, B. B. (2000). Comparison of combined spinal-epidural and low dose epidural for labour analgesia. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 47(3), 232–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03018918

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free