A national survey of prevention of infection in obstetric central neuraxial blockade in the UK

14Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We conducted a postal survey of all consultant-led UK obstetric anaesthetic units in August 2009, to assess the standard of aseptic technique used for neuraxial blocks. One hundred and sixty-four units responded giving a response rate of 76%; 93% of units (149/160) follow recommended precautions and attach a bacterial micropore filter to the epidural catheter. Epidural top-ups are provided by 72% (116/162) of units, with about two thirds using premixed solutions (of local anaesthetic with opioid) in a variety of ways: 51% (57/111) via a continuous infusion pump; 47% (52/111) by a prefilled syringe; and 23% (25/111) by multiple use of a premixed bag of solution. For spinals, 91% of units (149/164) add diamorphine: of these 85% (126/149) draw the diamorphine from non-sterile-wrapped ampoules. If required to draw opioid from a non-sterile-wrapped ampoule, 86% (119/138) of units use a micropore filter and 21% (29/138) wipe the ampoule neck with an alcohol swab. Although sepsis secondary to neuraxial block in obstetric practice is uncommon (declared by 8.5% of units over an unspecified period of time), there is scope for further improvement. © 2011 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKenzie, A. G., & Darragh, K. (2011). A national survey of prevention of infection in obstetric central neuraxial blockade in the UK. Anaesthesia, 66(6), 497–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06705.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free