THE ROLE OF SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCES IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THREE TYPES OF QUESTIONS

  • Williams G
  • Pérez‐González L
  • Vogt K
19Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This research replicated and extended a study by Williams, Donley, and Keller (2000). In that study, children with autism received a box with an object inside and learned to ask “What's that?,” “Can I see it?,” and “Can I have it?” to have the name of the object, to see the object, and to get the object, respectively. The purpose of the present research was to determine if the three questions (a) were three independent repertoires of behavior, (b) constituted three instances of a single functional response class, or (c) belonged to a chain of behavior. The 3 boys with autism who participated responded independently to each question when the consequences for each question were altered. This indicates that the three target responses were three independent repertoires of behavior, each one reinforced and maintained with its specific consequences. Thus, this procedure serves to teach children with autism to ask questions with flexibility according to a variable context.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Williams, G., Pérez‐González, L. A., & Vogt, K. (2003). THE ROLE OF SPECIFIC CONSEQUENCES IN THE MAINTENANCE OF THREE TYPES OF QUESTIONS. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36(3), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2003.36-285

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free