The Clinical Significance of Statistical Significance

  • Kane R
11Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Modern clinical trials provide the evidence for most therapeutic advances, and that evidence, expressed in a statistical format, is used to draw inferences about a population from the study's results. Clinician judgment translates these inferences for best individual patient care, but many clinicians struggle with the statistical interpretation of trial results. This review provides a clinical and non-Bayesian perspective on some key elements in the statistical design, analysis, and interpretation of randomized, comparative, phase III clinical trials intended to demonstrate a better outcome (superiority) than with a control treatment.

References Powered by Scopus

Interferon alfa-2b adjuvant therapy of high-risk resected cutaneous melanoma: The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group trial EST 1684

1917Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward evidence-based medical statistics. 1: The P value fallacy

976Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The challenge of subgroup analyses - Reporting without distorting

454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions

261Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures - A systematic review

157Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kane, R. C. (2008). The Clinical Significance of Statistical Significance. The Oncologist, 13(11), 1129–1133. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0186

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

55%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

28%

Researcher 5

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

69%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

17%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

7%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free