A follow-up to "Scale Effects in Memory for the Time of Events": The earthquake study

54Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study is a follow-up to Friedman and Wilkins's (1985) experiments on memory for the time of past events. That research showed that judgments of the time of past news events are often more accurate on finer than on grosser time scales. This finding is consistent with a reconstructive model but troublesome for models emphasizing judgments of the age of a memory. The present study was designed to control for the possibility that scale differences in Friedman and Wilkins's study were due to the use of general time knowledge to infer when events of a given sort were likely to have occurred. Ninety-nine subjects estimated the time of an earthquake that had occurred 9 months prior to recall and that they reported having actually experienced. Separate estimates were given on each of five time scales ranging from year to hour. Recall of hour was extremely accurate in spite of the relative inaccuracy of the next three grosser time scales. This and other results support Friedman and Wilkins's original interpretation. © 1987 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

The subjective dates of natural events in very-long-term memory

166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A two-process memory-strength theory for judgment of recency

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Scale effects in memory for the timeof events

85Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Remembering the Earthquake: Direct Experience vs. Hearing the News

168Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Source monitoring

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Time in autobiographical memory

141Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Friedman, W. J. (1987). A follow-up to “Scale Effects in Memory for the Time of Events”: The earthquake study. Memory & Cognition, 15(6), 518–520. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198386

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

21%

Researcher 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 6

55%

Neuroscience 2

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

18%

Social Sciences 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free