In this study, we tested elements of the multi-process retrieval account of autobiographical memory, retrieval multiplicity, and retrieval selectivity. The retrieval multiplicity states that multiple different retrieval strategies are used to recall autobiographical memories, while the retrieval selectivity states that such retrieval strategies will vary in accord with the cuing environment. We tested these hypotheses across two experiments with the retrieve-aloud procedure. In the retrieve-aloud procedure, participants were required to verbalize their thoughts while attempting to retrieve personal memories in response to phrase cues (e.g., listening to music). Experiments 1 and 2 found support for the retrieval multiplicity by showing that participants used a variety of different retrieval processes (eight different processes in total), while Experiment 1 found support for the retrieval selectivity by showing that retrieval strategies varied across different cue types. The implications of the findings are discussed with respect to autobiographical memory, as well as semantic memory.
CITATION STYLE
Mace, J. H., Staley, B. J. A., & Sopoci, M. K. K. (2021). When trying to recall our past, all roads lead to Rome: More evidence for the multi-process retrieval theory of autobiographical memory. Memory and Cognition, 49(3), 438–450. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01099-1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.