Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange

12Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

People generally adhere to the norm of reciprocity during both tacit and negotiated exchange. Emotional responses generated from profitable and unprofitable exchange facilitate the formation of motives to settle scores with others. In two studies we examine how exchange incidents trigger positive and negative emotional responses, bargaining behavior, and process. In Study 1, we developed measures of emotional response toward the counterpart that can index the state of relational accounts between parties. In a complex, multi-issue negotiation, The measures show that prior profitable or unprofitable exchange experiences shifted affect and individual social motives, as well as initial bargaining positions. In Study 2, shifts in relational accounts altered the bargaining process and subsequent implementation of agreements. The relational accounting concept represents an important link for understanding how negotiation functions as a sub-process in the wider stream of social exchange.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mislin, A. A., Boumgarden, P. A., Jang, D., & Bottom, W. P. (2015). Accounting for reciprocity in negotiation and social exchange. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(6), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500007014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free