Natural disaster insurance and the equity-efficiency trade-off

53Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article investigates the role of private insurance in the prevention and mitigation of natural disasters. We characterize the equity-efficiency trade-off faced by the policymakers under imperfect information about individual prevention costs. It is shown that a competitive insurance market with actuarial rate making and compensatory tax-subsidy transfers is likely to dominate regulated uniform insurance pricing rules or state-funded assistance schemes. The model illustrates how targeted tax cuts on insurance contracts can improve the incentives to prevention while compensating individuals with high prevention costs. The article highlights the complementarity between individual incentives through tax cuts and collective incentives through grants to the local jurisdictions where risk management plans are enforced. © The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 2008.

References Powered by Scopus

Mitigating disaster losses through insurance

406Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Demand for Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence

338Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Market failure in information: The National Flood Insurance Program

108Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adaptation planning and implementation

185Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate finance policy in practice: a review of the evidence

109Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flood insurance schemes and climate adaptation in developing countries

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Picard, P. (2008). Natural disaster insurance and the equity-efficiency trade-off. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 75(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2007.00246.x

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 28

65%

Researcher 9

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

2%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12

38%

Environmental Science 9

28%

Social Sciences 7

22%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 4

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0