Direct, Competitive Comparison of Linear, Monocyclic, and Bicyclic Libraries Using mRNA Display

17Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Peptide macrocyclization is typically associated with the development of higher affinity and more protease stable protein ligands, and, as such, is an important tool in peptide drug discovery. Yet, within the context of a diverse library, does cyclization give inherent advantages over linear peptides? Here, we used mRNA display to create a peptide library of diverse ring sizes and topologies (monocyclic, bicyclic, and linear). Several rounds of in vitro selection against streptavidin were performed and the winning peptide sequences were analyzed for their binding affinities and overall topologies. The effect of adding a protease challenge on the enrichment of various peptides was also investigated. Taken together, the selection output yields insights about the relative abundance of binders of various topologies within a structurally diverse library.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hacker, D. E., Hacker, D. E., Abrigo, N. A., Abrigo, N. A., Hoinka, J., Richardson, S. L., … Hartman, M. C. T. (2020). Direct, Competitive Comparison of Linear, Monocyclic, and Bicyclic Libraries Using mRNA Display. ACS Combinatorial Science, 22(6), 306–310. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscombsci.0c00016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free