Measuring coverage and quality of supportive care for inpatient neonatal infections: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study

2Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background An estimated 7 million episodes of severe newborn infections occur annually worldwide, with half a million newborn deaths, most occurring in lowand middle-income countries. Whilst injectable antibiotics are necessary to treat the infection, supportive care is also crucial in ending preventable mortality and morbidity. This study uses multi-country data to assess gaps in coverage, quality, and documentation of supportive care, considering implications for measurement. Methods The EN-BIRTH study was conducted in five hospitals in Bangladesh, Nepal, and Tanzania (July 2017-July 2018). Newborns with an admission diagnosis of clinically-defined infection (sepsis, meningitis, and/or pneumonia) were included. Researchers extracted data from inpatient case notes and interviews with women (usually the mothers) as the primary family caretakers after discharge. The interviews were conducted using a structured survey questionnaire. We used descriptive statistics to report coverage of newborn supportive care components such as oxygen use, phototherapy, and appropriate feeding, and we assessed the validity of measurement through survey-reports using a random-effects model to generate pooled estimates. In this study, key supportive care components were assessment and correction of hypoxaemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and hypoglycaemia. Results Among 1015 neonates who met the inclusion criteria, 89% had an admission clinical diagnosis of sepsis. Major gaps in documentation and care practices related to supportive care varied substantially across the participating hospitals. The pooled sensitivity was low for the survey-reported oxygen use (47%; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 30%-64%) and moderate for phototherapy (60%; 95% CI = 44%-75%). The pooled specificity was high for both the survey-reported oxygen use (85%; 95% CI = 80%-89%) and phototherapy (91%; 95% CI = 82%-97%). Conclusions The women’s reports during the exit survey consistently underestimated the coverage of supportive care components for managing infection. We have observed high variability in the inpatient documents across facilities. A standardised ward register for inpatient small and sick newborn care may capture selected supportive care data. However, tracking the detailed care will require standardised individual-level data sets linked to newborn case notes. We recommend investments in assessing the implementation aspects of a standardised inpatient register in resource-poor settings.

References Powered by Scopus

Principal component analysis

9949Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration

3544Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Every newborn: Progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival

1314Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Introducing a standardised register for strengthening the inpatient management of newborns and sick children: Implementation research in selected health facilities of Bangladesh

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Formulation, Quality Control and Stability Study of Pediatric Oral Dextrose Gel

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hossain, A. T., Ameen, S., Salim, N., Ashish, K. C., Ruysen, H., Tahsina, T., … EN-BIRTH Study Group. (2022). Measuring coverage and quality of supportive care for inpatient neonatal infections: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study. Journal of Global Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.12.04029

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

71%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

14%

Researcher 1

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

56%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Sports and Recreations 1

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0