The Argument of the Broken Pane

  • Chapman J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Within the cut-throat world of newspaper advertising the newspapers of Britain's Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) Votes for Women and the Suffragette managed to achieve a balance that has often proved to be an impossible challenge for social movement press - namely the maintenance of a highly political stance whilst simultaneously exploiting the market system with advertising and merchandising. When the militant papers advocated window smashing of West End stores in 1912-1913, the companies who were the target still took advertisements. Why? What was the relationship between news values, militant violence and advertising income? Do-it-yourself journalism operated within a context of ethical consumerism and promotionally orientated militancy. This resulted in newspaper connections between politics, commerce and a distinct market profile, evident in the customisation of advertising, retailer dialogue with militants and longer-term loyalty - symptomatic of a wider trend towards newspaper commercialism during this period.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, J. (2015). The Argument of the Broken Pane. Media History, 21(3), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688804.2014.977238

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free