Effect of dexmedetomidine-etomidate-fentanyl combined anesthesia on somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients undergoing spinal surgery

13Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. A total of 36 patients who received spinal surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups (n=18 per group), group C, the test group and group D, the control group, and these groups were subjected to a matching anesthesia induction. In brief, the anesthesia was administered via injection of etomidate and fentanyl; once the patients were unconscious, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted, SEPs and MEPs were monitored and the collected data were considered to be basic data. Cisatracurium was subsequently injected and an endotracheal tube (7#) was inserted to replace the LMA. The following procedures were conducted for anesthesia maintenance: Group C, the anesthesia was maintained via target-controlled infusion of etomidate and intermittent injection of fentanyl; and group D, DEX (0.5 μg/kg) was injected over a duration of 10 min and then pumped at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/h. In the two groups, all of the other drugs used were the same and a muscle relaxant was not administered. The bispectral index was maintained between 45 and 55 during surgery, and the SEPs and MEPs were monitored continuously until the surgery was completed. No significant difference in duration and amplitude of the SEPs (P15-N20) was identified between group C and D (P>0.05). Furthermore, the MEPs were monitored in the two groups at specific durations and no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). The SEPs and MEPs were maintained in the patients This aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on the intraoperative monitoring of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in patients undergoing spinal surgery. A total of 36 patients who received spinal surgery under general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups (n=18 per group), group C, the test group and group D, the control group, and these groups were subjected to a matching anesthesia induction. In brief, the anesthesia was administered via injection of etomidate and fentanyl; once the patients were unconscious, a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted, SEPs and MEPs were monitored and the collected data were considered to be basic data. Cisatracurium was subsequently injected and an endotracheal tube (7#) was inserted to replace the LMA. The following procedures were conducted for anesthesia maintenance: Group C, the anesthesia was maintained via target-controlled infusion of etomidate and intermittent injection of fentanyl; and group D, DEX (0.5 μg/kg) was injected over a duration of 10 min and then pumped at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/h. In the two groups, all of the other drugs used were the same and a muscle relaxant was not administered. The bispectral index was maintained between 45 and 55 during surgery, and the SEPs and MEPs were monitored continuously until the surgery was completed. No significant difference in duration and amplitude of the SEPs (P15-N20) was identified between group C and D (P>0.05). Furthermore, the MEPs were monitored in the two groups at specific durations and no significant difference was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). The SEPs and MEPs were maintained in the patients who were administered with the DEX-etomidate-fentanyl combined anesthesia during spinal surgery.

Figures

  • Table I. Comparison of patient characteristics and the dosage of etomidate and fentanyl, in the two groups (means ± standard deviation).
  • Table II. Comparison of HR and MAP (means ± standard deviation).
  • Table III. Comparison of the amplitude and latency of SEP waves (P15-N20; means ± standard deviation).
  • Table IV. Comparison of the positive event number of motor-evoked potentials in the two groups.

References Powered by Scopus

Characterization of the selectivity, specificity and potency of medetomidine as an α<inf>2</inf>-adrenoceptor agonist

612Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Alpha-2 adrenergic agonists to prevent perioperative cardiovascular complications: A meta-analysis

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery

337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Protective effects of dexmedetomidine on intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury

31Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Perioperative Care of Patients Undergoing Major Complex Spinal Instrumentation Surgery: Clinical Practice Guidelines from the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, S., Dai, N., Cheng, Z., Shao, W., & Fu, Z. (2014). Effect of dexmedetomidine-etomidate-fentanyl combined anesthesia on somatosensory- and motor-evoked potentials in patients undergoing spinal surgery. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 7(5), 1383–1387. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2014.1555

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

69%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

13%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

65%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

18%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 2

12%

Energy 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0