Inequitable representation of Black boys in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and special education

2Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Black boys are overrepresented in special education (SPED) and underrepresented in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and other opportunities for advanced learners. Conversely, they are overrepresented in SPED. In this article, we address the vicious cycle of deficit thinking and intelligence test inequities—the consequences and impact on Black males. The impact of high-stakes testing and racial prejudice and discrimination is stark. We present an equity formula to guide readers in all roles in setting quantifiable equity goals. Recommendations are provided.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ford, D. Y., Hines, E. M., Middleton, T. J., & Moore, J. L. (2023). Inequitable representation of Black boys in gifted and talented education, Advanced Placement, and special education. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 51(4), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12283

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free