RNA-seq Fusion Detection in Clinical Oncology

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Gene fusions play a prominent role in the oncogenesis of many cancers and have been extensively targeted as biomarkers for diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes. Detection methods span a number of platforms, including cytogenetics (e.g., FISH), targeted qPCR, and sequencing-based assays. Before the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS), fusion testing was primarily targeted to specific genome loci, with assays tailored for previously characterized fusion events. The availability of whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) allows for genome-wide screening for the simultaneous detection of both known and novel fusions. RNA-seq, in particular, offers the possibility of rapid turn-around testing with less dedicated sequencing than WGS. This makes it an attractive target for clinical oncology testing, particularly when transcriptome data can be multi-purposed for tumor classification and additional analyses. Despite considerable efforts and substantial progress, however, genome-wide screening for fusions solely based on RNA-seq data remains an ongoing challenge. A host of technical artifacts adversely impact the sensitivity and specificity of existing software tools. In this chapter, the general strategies employed by current fusion software are discussed, and a selection of available fusion detection tools are surveyed. Despite its current limitations, RNA-seq-based fusion detection offers a more comprehensive and efficient strategy as compared to multiple targeted fusion assays. When thoughtfully employed within a wider ecosystem of diagnostic assays and clinical information, RNA-seq fusion detection represents a powerful tool for precision oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hedges, D. J. (2022). RNA-seq Fusion Detection in Clinical Oncology. In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Vol. 1361, pp. 163–175). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91836-1_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free