Opportunities for research in mental health emergencies: Executive summary and methodology

8Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the ever-increasing numbers of mental health patients presenting to United States emergency departments, there are large gaps in knowledge about acute care of the behavioral health patient. To address this important problem, the Coalition on Psychiatric Emergencies convened a research consensus conference in December 2016 consisting of clinical researchers, clinicians from emergency medicine, psychiatry and psychology, and representatives from governmental agencies and patient advocacy groups. Methods: Participants used a standardized methodology to select and rank research questions in the order of importance to both researchers and patients. Results: Three working groups (geriatrics, substance use disorders, and psychosis) reached consensus on 26 questions within their respective domains. These questions are summarized in this document. Conclusion: The research consensus conference is the first of its kind to include non-clinicians in helping identify knowledge gaps in behavioral emergencies. It is hoped that these questions will prove useful to prioritize future research within the specialty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilson, M. P., Shenvi, C., Rives, L., Nordstrom, K., Schneider, S., & Gerardi, M. (2019, March 1). Opportunities for research in mental health emergencies: Executive summary and methodology. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. eScholarship. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2019.1.39260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free