Husserl planned to deal with a philosophy of Euclidean geometry in the second and unpublished volume of the Philosophie der Arithmetik. Thus, after the publication of the first volume, he outlined an analytical/formal method that should have allowed a pure understanding of any spatial manifold. Nevertheless, dealing with the analytical geometry of Bernhard Riemann, he understood the limits of a pure formal approach. Therefore, he started investigating space representation from a psychological point of view, trying to detect those intuitions grounding geometrical concepts. Notwithstanding, Husserl abandoned this geometrizing space theory too because, in my view, it did not offer a plain explanation of the relations between geometry and space theory, material, and formal concepts. In this paper, I investigate the reasons why in his early studies Husserl wavered from a formalizing to an intuitive approach to the space problem.
CITATION STYLE
Caracciolo, E. (2015). Formalization and Intuition in Husserl’s Raumbuch. In Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science (Vol. 308, pp. 33–50). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10434-8_3
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.