Color stability of a bulk-fill composite resin light-cured at different distances

16Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the color stability of a bulk-fill (Filtek One Bulk Fill, 3M ESPE) and a conventional (Filtek Z350 XT, 3M ESPE) composite resin light-cured at different distances, before and after being submitted to staining with a coffee solution. Sixty specimens of each composite resin were prepared and light-cured at distances of 0, 2 and 4 mm, using a LED light-curing unit (Valo, Ultradent). The specimens were separated (n = 10) for immersion in either distilled water or coffee solution (10 minutes a day for 8 days) to stimulate staining. Color evaluations were performed before and after immersion in the solutions, according to CIELab (▲E a b), CIEDE2000 (▲E00) and the Whiteness Index for Dentistry (▲WID). Kruskal Wallis and Dunn tests, Mann-Whitney tests and Wilcoxon test were applied (α = 5 %). The a* value for conventional composite resin showed a significant increase after immersion in coffee and distilled water (p < 0.05). Both composite resins showed greater b* values when immersed in coffee than in distilled water, with no significant difference among the light-activation distances (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference for L* among the light-activation distances; both resins showed significant decrease in L* after immersion in coffee (p < 0.05). Color change (▲Eab, ▲E00) and difference in whiteness (▲WID) were higher for conventional resin when immersed in the coffee solution at all the light-activation distances. Conventional composite resin presented a higher staining value than bulk-fill composite resin, regardless of the light-activation distance.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

BACKES, C. N., Gomes FRANÇA, F. M., TURSSI, C. P., do AMARAL, F. L. B., & BASTING, R. T. (2020). Color stability of a bulk-fill composite resin light-cured at different distances. Brazilian Oral Research, 34, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free