D-dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism

24Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to estimate D-dimer interval likelihood ratios (iLRs) for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods: The authors used pooled patient-level data from five PE diagnostic management studies to estimate iLRs for the eight D-dimer intervals with boundaries 250, 500, 750, 1,000, 1,500, 2,500, and 5,000 ng/mL. Logistic regression was used to fit the data so that an interval increase corresponds to increasing the likelihood ratio by a constant factor. Results: The iLR for the D-dimer interval 1,000–1,499 ng/mL was essentially 1.0 (0.98 with 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.82–1.18). In the logistic regression model, the constant between-interval factor was 2.0 (95% CI = 1.9–2.1). Using these iLR estimates, if the pre–D-dimer probability of PE is 15%, only a D-dimer less than 500 ng/mL will result in a posttest probability below 3%; if the pretest probability is 5%, the threshold for a “negative” D-dimer is 1,000 ng/mL. Conclusions: A decision strategy based on these approximate iLRs agrees with several published strategies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kohn, M. A., Klok, F. A., & van Es, N. (2017). D-dimer Interval Likelihood Ratios for Pulmonary Embolism. Academic Emergency Medicine, 24(7), 832–837. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13191

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free