Disparity-space images and large occlusion stereo

100Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A new method for solving the stereo matching problem in the presence of large occlusion is presented. A data structure — the disparity space image — is defined in which we explicitly model the effects of occlusion regions on the stereo solution. We develop a dynamic programming algorithm that finds matches and occlusions simultaneously. We show that while some cost must be assigned to unmatched pixels, our algorithm's occlusion-cost sensitivity and algorithmic complexity can be significantly reduced when highly-reliable matches, or ground control points, are incorporated into the matching process. The use of ground control points eliminates both the need for biasing the process towards a smooth solution and the task of selecting critical prior probabilities describing image formation.

References Powered by Scopus

STEREO BY INTRA- AND INTER-SCANLINE SEARCH USING DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING.

744Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Structure from Stereo—A Review

670Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points

267Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

DAISY: An efficient dense descriptor applied to wide-baseline stereo

1257Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pixelwise view selection for unstructured multi-view stereo

1028Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A pixel dissimilarity measure that is insensitive to image sampling

501Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Intille, S. S., & Bobick, A. F. (1994). Disparity-space images and large occlusion stereo. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 801 LNCS, pp. 179–186). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0028349

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

53%

Researcher 8

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

19%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 23

68%

Engineering 9

26%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free