The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations

16Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This article addresses, conceptually and empirically, the classification of public research organizations (PROs) understood as non-university and non-enterprise research-focused organizations that are public by nature or in which the government has an influence. The construction of archetypes of research performing organizations has been a standard method of analysis, as reflected in the Frascati Manual that guides national statistical offices to delineate the perimeter of the institutional sector of PROs. However, this practice has often overlooked the emergence of new types because traditional approaches to classification tend to characterize previously defined mutually exclusive categories, rather than allow evidence to reveal categories ex-post. This gives rise to a number of concerns related to the scientific validity of the classification of entities in the organizational field of research. The present article discusses conceptual and methodological issues associated with different classificatory strategies. It also presents the empirical results of a taxonomical exploration that allows the identification of categories not determined ex-ante. Our empirical strategy consists in applying clustering techniques on a number of organizational dimensions, chosen based on theoretical grounds and proxied by variables determined by data availability. We implement it on a pilot dataset of 197 research-focused organizations from eight different European countries.

References Powered by Scopus

Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering

1743Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizations evolving, second edition

787Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment

604Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Technology transfer performance of public research institutes: the case of Romania

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fiction lagging behind or non-fiction defending the indefensible? University–industry (et al.) interaction in science fiction

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The role of public external knowledge for firm innovativeness

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cruz-Castro, L., Martínez, C., Peñasco, C., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2020). The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa013

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

11%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 9

50%

Social Sciences 6

33%

Engineering 2

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0