The influence of carbon budget methodology on assessments of the impacts of forest management on the carbon balance

  • Matthews R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is now a substantial body of literature in scientific journals on the carbon (C) balance of forest ecosystems at all geographical scales, and some authors have proposed changes in the way forests are managed in order to enhance the offsetting or reduction of emissions of C to the atmosphere. As yet, however, there is no widely accepted and applied method for estimating the C budget of forests and the impacts of forest management on C sequestration. This paper describes how the results of C budgeting exercises depend strongly on the methodologies employed, and briefly considers the scope for developing conventions for the calculation and presentation of C budgets for forest ecosystems and forestry projects. These points are illustrated using examples of model simulations of the effects of alternative methods of forest management in Britain, and by comparison of published results of studies in other countries based on different C budgeting methodologies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matthews, R. (1996). The influence of carbon budget methodology on assessments of the impacts of forest management on the carbon balance. In Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle (pp. 233–243). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61111-7_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free