All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials

22Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Designs for biomarker validation have been proposed and used in the phase III oncology clinical trial setting. Broadly, these designs follow either an enrichment (i.e., targeted) strategy or an all-comers (i.e., unselected) strategy. An enrichment design screens patients for the presence or absence of a marker or a panel of markers and then only includes patients who either have or do not have a certain marker characteristic or profile. In contrast, all patients meeting the eligibility criteria (regardless of a particular biomarker status) are entered into an all-comers design. The strength of the preliminary evidence, the prevalence of the marker, the reproducibility and validity of the assay, and the feasibility of real-time marker assessment play a major role in the choice of the design. In this report, we discuss the parameters under which the enrichment or an all-comers design strategy would be appropriate for phase II trials. Copyright © 2011 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mandrekar, S. J., & Sargent, D. J. (2011). All-comers versus enrichment design strategy in phase II trials. Journal of Thoracic Oncology, 6(4), 658–660. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e31820e17cb

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free