The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2—Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use

33Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives Diagnostics are essential for controlling the pandemic. Identifying a reliable and fast diagnostic device is needed for effective testing. We assessed performance and ease-of-use of the Abbott PanBio antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT). Methods This prospective, multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study enrolled at two sites in Germany. Following routine testing with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a second study-exclusive swab was performed for Ag-RDT testing. Routine swabs were nasopharyngeal (NP) or combined NP/oropharyngeal (OP) whereas the study-exclusive swabs were NP. To evaluate performance, sensitivity and specificity were assessed overall and in predefined sub-analyses accordingly to cycle-threshold values, days after symptom onset, disease severity and study site. Additionally, an ease-of-use assessment (EoU) and System Usability Scale (SUS) were performed. Results 1108 participants were enrolled between Sept 28 and Oct 30, 2020. Of these, 106 (9.6%) were PCR-positive. The Abbott PanBio detected 92/106 PCR-positive participants with a sensitivity of 86.8% (95% CI: 79.0% - 92.0%) and a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.4%-100%). The sub-analyses indicated that sensitivity was 95.8% in Ct-values <25 and within the first seven days from symptom onset. The test was characterized as easy to use (SUS: 86/100) and considered suitable for point-of-care settings. Conclusion The Abbott PanBio Ag-RDT performs well for SARS-CoV-2 testing in this large manufacturer independent study, confirming its WHO recommendation for Emergency Use in settings with limited resources.

References Powered by Scopus

Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support

36111Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR

5439Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale

3349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

132Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Performance of Rapid Antigen Tests for COVID-19 Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Accuracy of rapid point-of-care antigen-based diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression analyzing influencing factors

51Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krüger, L. J., Gaeddert, M., Tobian, F., Lainati, F., Gottschalk, C., Klein, J. A. F., … Denkinger, C. M. (2021). The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2—Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use. PLoS ONE, 16(5 May). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247918

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

63%

Researcher 7

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 22

65%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 7

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

9%

Social Sciences 2

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free