Assembled but unrehearsed: corporate food power and the ‘dance’ of supply chain sustainability

19Citations
Citations of this article
103Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In recent years, many of the companies collectively known as ‘Big Food’ have undertaken efforts to assess and improve agricultural sustainability, both within their own supply chains and as members of multi-stakeholder initiatives (MSIs). Taking up Friedmann’s call for closer attention to corporate sustainability practices, this paper finds that companies are doing more than they advertise, but making slower progress than originally hoped. Up to a point, political economy perspectives on corporate power and governance help to explain both why these MSIs have taken shape, and why their corporate members’ immense market power might not guarantee quick results. Yet these perspectives do not fully capture how corporations’ sustainability efforts contend with not only other actors’ challenges to their legitimacy and authority, but also their own lack of knowledge and access to information. This paper therefore also draws on global assemblage and science and technology studies (STS) frameworks in order to analyze corporate power–and its limits–inside a set of ongoing sustainability initiatives.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freidberg, S. (2020). Assembled but unrehearsed: corporate food power and the ‘dance’ of supply chain sustainability. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(2), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2018.1534835

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free