Caudillismo y clientelismo: expresiones de una misma lógica. El Fracaso del Modelo Liberal en Latinoamérica

  • Pizano L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Charles Taylor’s A Secular Age is both important and insufficient to the study of religion, law, and politics in Latin America. While aspects of the North Atlantic experience of secularity have become globalized, shaping legal systems and other forms of collective governance around the world, local and regional histories and experiences often depart significantly from Taylor’s account of secularity and conception of religion. Scholars of religion and politics in the region need to consider those aspects of local and regional history, such as indigenous and Afro-descendent histories and experiences, that challenge or may be indifferent to globalized Euro-American experiences of secularity and religion. To do so requires grappling with the global effects of the history charted by Taylor while also moving beyond it to account for practices, histories, and ways of life that work outside or against “secularity 3” and the presumptions about religion that it presupposes and produces.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pizano, L. (2001). Caudillismo y clientelismo: expresiones de una misma lógica. El Fracaso del Modelo Liberal en Latinoamérica. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (9), 75–83. https://doi.org/10.7440/res9.2001.08

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free