The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review

3Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This literature review aimed to gain more insight into the level of anatomical knowledge based on published measurements among medical students, residents, fellows, and specialists. Methods: We performed an extensive literature search in three online databases: Medline (using PubMed), Web of Science, and Education Resources Information Centre (ERIC). Results: A total of 30 relevant studies were found. In these studies, participants took different anatomy tests, and their mean/median scaled scores range from 22.5 to 82.4% on a 0 to 100% scale. Conclusion: This review provides an overview of what is known about measured anatomical knowledge. After critically reviewing the literature, we have to conclude that the existing literature confirms that anatomical knowledge is hard to establish, mainly due to the lack of standardisation. Further research should focus on ways to define and assess ‘desired anatomical knowledge’ in different contexts. In a next phase, we can discuss if anatomical knowledge is lacking and if interventions are needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koppes, D. M., Triepels, C. P. R., Notten, K. J. B., Smeets, C. F. A., Kruitwagen, R. F. P. M., Van Gorp, T., … Van Kuijk, S. M. J. (2022, April 1). The Level of Anatomical Knowledge, Hard to Establish: a Systematic Narrative Review. Medical Science Educator. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-022-01509-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free