Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for management of peritoneal sarcomatosis: A preliminary single-center experience from Saudi Arabia

15Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim. To report our preliminary single-center experience with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for management of peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS). Methods. Eleven patients were retrospectively analyzed for perioperative details. Results. Cytoreduction completeness (CC-0/1) was achieved in all patients with median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) of 14 ± 8.9 (range: 3-29). Combination cisplatin + doxorubicin HIPEC chemotherapy was used in 6 patients. Five patients received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). The median operative time, estimated blood loss, and hospital stay were 8 ± 1.4 hours (range: 6-10), 1000 ± 250 mL (range: 700-3850), and 11 ± 2.4 days (range: 7-15), respectively. Major postoperative Clavien-Dindo grade III/IV complications occurred in 1 patient and none developed HIPEC chemotherapy-related toxicities. The median overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) after CRS + HIPEC were 28.3 ± 3.2 and 18.0 ± 4.0 months, respectively. The median follow-up time was 12 months (range: 6-33). Univariate analysis of several prognostic factors (age, gender, PS presentation/pathology, CC, PCI, HIPEC chemotherapy, and IORT) did not demonstrate statistically significant differences of OS and DFS. Conclusion. CRS + HIPEC appear to be feasible, safe, and offer survival oncological benefits. However, definitive conclusions cannot be deduced.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abu-Zaid, A., Azzam, A., Abuzaid, M., Elhassan, T., Albadawi, N., Alkhatib, L., … Al-Badawi, I. A. (2016). Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for management of peritoneal sarcomatosis: A preliminary single-center experience from Saudi Arabia. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6567473

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free