Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus) Use Water as a Tool in the Floating Object Task

  • DeLong C
  • Burnett C
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Citation-DeLong, C. M., & Burnett, C. (2020). Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus) use water as a tool in the floating object task. Abstract-The purpose of this study was to investigate Bornean orangutans' ability to use water as a tool. In the floating object task, subjects must spit water into a vertical transparent tube to obtain an out-of-reach food reward (peanut). Two zoo-living orangutans were tested: Denda, a 13-year-old male, and Kumang, a 38-year-old female. Three conditions were presented: 'wet', in which the tube was quarter-filled with water; 'dry-stick tools', in which the tube had no water and six stick tools that were unnecessary for obtaining the reward were provided; and 'dry', in which the tube had no water and no stick tools were provided. Both subjects completed two sessions in each condition. The dry conditions were presented first because it is a cognitively more demanding task to use water to obtain the peanut when there is no water in the tube initially to provide a cue. Denda was successful in all six sessions while Kumang was successful in only three sessions. Both subjects' latency to spit water into the tube decreased exponentially across sessions. Both individuals displayed a variety of strategies to solve the problem, including using and manufacturing tools utilizing objects in their enclosure. Denda is the first orangutan to succeed on the task when presented with the 'dry' condition first. This study provides the first evidence of Bornean orangutans spontaneously solving the floating object task, but the mechanism underlying their success remains unclear.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

DeLong, C. M., & Burnett, C. (2020). Bornean Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus) Use Water as a Tool in the Floating Object Task. Animal Behavior and Cognition, 7(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.26451/abc.07.03.05.2020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free