A field test of the effects of instruction design on colorectal cancer self-screening accuracy

15Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A field experiment tested whether instruction design improves accurate adherence to instructions for medical do-it-yourself tests like the Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT). As part of an outreach campaign, 16073 participants received FOBTs with instructions that were (i) human factored, (ii) motivational, (iii) human factored/motivational combined, or (iv) the standard used in the past. Among all test results returned (N = 2483), only the human factors instructions reduced errors in filling out result cards. However, after post-validating result cards that had errors, the human-factored, motivational and merged instructions reduced errors. The present findings show that medical instructions designed with human factors and persuasion principles increase accurate adherence. These design principles provide simple and cost-effective ways to increase test taking accuracy and FOBT effectiveness. Better screening instructions can improve the chances of detecting colorectal cancer early, which may help to decrease cancer mortality. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Feufel, M. A., Schneider, T. R., & Berkel, H. J. (2010). A field test of the effects of instruction design on colorectal cancer self-screening accuracy. Health Education Research, 25(5), 709–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyq015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free