Analysis of Students' Analytical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Communication Using Online Group Investigation Learning Model

  • Al-Hanifah J
  • Cholily Y
  • Ummah S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Analytical thinking and mathematical communication are abilities included in the learning process objectives. This study aims to describe students' analytical thinking skills and mathematical communication using the online group investigation cooperative learning model. The subjects of this research were 30 students of class VIII-C. The type of research used is descriptive qualitative. The data to determine the implementation of learning and the ability to think analytically and communicate mathematically are observations, documentation, and tests. The study results show that the online group investigation type cooperative learning model implementation takes place following the steps of group investigation learning. The results of the ability to think analytically and communicate mathematically meet all indicators. The distinguishing indicator of analytical thinking ability is the most widely achieved, and the one that has yet to be completed much is the attributing indicator. So that students' analytical thinking skills have an analytical category. The most widely conducted indicator of mathematical communication ability is the indicator of expressing mathematical ideas in writing. What has yet to be widely achieved is the indicator of analyzing and evaluating mathematical concepts. So that students' mathematical communication skills have a mathematical category.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Al-Hanifah, J. A., Cholily, Y. M., & Ummah, S. K. (2023). Analysis of Students’ Analytical Thinking Ability and Mathematical Communication Using Online Group Investigation Learning Model. Mathematics Education Journal, 7(1), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.22219/mej.v7i1.23342

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

83%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 2

40%

Mathematics 2

40%

Linguistics 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0